Skip to main content

1. Purpose

Squid Academy is committed to maintaining high standards of academic integrity, honesty, and ethical conduct across all educational programs, assessments, projects, coursework, and certification activities. Learners are expected to submit work that represents their own knowledge, understanding, and effort. This policy outlines Squid Academy’s expectations regarding plagiarism, academic misconduct, artificial intelligence (AI) tools, cheating, collusion, and other forms of dishonest academic behavior.

2. Scope

This policy applies to:
  • Students
  • Learners
  • Apprentices
  • Candidates
  • Participants in accredited programmes
  • Participants in non-accredited programmes
The policy applies to:
  • Written assignments
  • Coursework
  • Assessments
  • Projects
  • Presentations
  • Practical activities
  • Portfolio submissions
  • Online assessments
  • Certification activities

3. Academic Integrity Principles

All learners are expected to:
  • Submit their own work.
  • Acknowledge the work of others appropriately.
  • Use sources honestly.
  • Follow assessment instructions.
  • Complete assessments independently unless collaboration is explicitly permitted.
  • Maintain honesty throughout the learning process.
Academic integrity supports fairness, credibility, and the value of qualifications and certifications awarded by Squid Academy.

4. What Is Plagiarism?

Plagiarism occurs when a learner presents another person’s work, ideas, words, research, or intellectual property as their own without appropriate acknowledgement. Plagiarism may be intentional or unintentional. Both forms may result in academic penalties.

5. Examples of Plagiarism

Examples include:

Direct Copying

Copying text from:
  • Websites
  • Books
  • Articles
  • Reports
  • Other learners
without an appropriate citation.

Paraphrasing Without Attribution

Rewriting someone else’s work while presenting it as original.

Copying Assignments

Submitting all or part of another learner’s work.

Reusing Previous Work

Submitting previously assessed work without permission.

Unauthorised Translation

Translating another person’s work and presenting it as original.

Using Purchased Work

Submitting work created by another individual or service.

6. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use

Squid Academy recognizes that AI tools may be used responsibly as learning aids. Examples include:
  • Research assistance
  • Brainstorming ideas
  • Grammar checking
  • Structure suggestions
  • Study support
However, learners must not submit AI-generated content as entirely their own work unless explicitly permitted by the assessment instructions. Where AI use is permitted, learners may be required to:
  • Declare the AI tool used.
  • Explain how the tool was used.
  • Demonstrate personal understanding of the submitted work.
The Academy reserves the right to investigate submissions suspected of excessive or inappropriate AI-generated content.

7. Collusion

Collusion occurs when learners work together inappropriately on an assessment intended to be completed individually. Examples include:
  • Sharing answers.
  • Jointly producing individual assignments.
  • Allowing another learner to copy work.
Collusion is considered academic misconduct.

8. Cheating

Cheating includes any dishonest action designed to gain an unfair academic advantage. Examples include:
  • Using unauthorized materials.
  • Accessing prohibited resources during assessments.
  • Receiving unauthorized assistance.
  • Impersonation.
  • Falsifying assessment evidence.

9. Contract Cheating

Contract cheating occurs when a learner arranges for another person or organisation to complete work on their behalf. Examples include:
  • Purchasing assignments.
  • Hiring writers.
  • Using essay-writing services.
  • Paying third parties to complete assessments.
Contract cheating is considered a serious breach of academic integrity.

10. Referencing and Citations

Learners should:
  • Acknowledge all sources used.
  • Use appropriate citations where required.
  • Clearly identify quotations.
  • Follow assessment guidance on referencing standards.
Staff may provide guidance on acceptable referencing methods.

11. Detection Methods

Squid Academy may use various methods to identify potential misconduct, including:
  • Plagiarism detection software.
  • Similarity reports.
  • Assessment reviews.
  • Oral questioning.
  • Practical demonstrations.
  • Staff observations.
  • AI-detection indicators.
  • Verification interviews.
The Academy reserves the right to investigate any work that appears inconsistent with a learner’s demonstrated ability or previous performance.

12. Investigation Procedure

Where academic misconduct is suspected:
  1. The concern will be documented.
  2. Evidence will be reviewed.
  3. The learner may be invited to provide an explanation.
  4. A fair and impartial decision will be made.
  5. The outcome will be recorded.
The Academy will ensure investigations are conducted consistently and proportionately.

13. Academic Misconduct Outcomes

Depending on severity, outcomes may include the following:

Minor Breach

Examples:
  • Incorrect referencing
  • First-time citation errors
Possible outcomes:
  • Feedback and guidance
  • Resubmission opportunity

Moderate Breach

Examples:
  • Significant unattributed content
  • Copying sections of work
Possible outcomes:
  • Assessment penalty
  • Resubmission requirement
  • Formal warning

Serious Breach

Examples:
  • Contract cheating
  • Deliberate plagiarism
  • Assessment fraud
  • Impersonation
Possible outcomes:
  • Assessment failure
  • Programme removal
  • Disqualification from certification
  • Notification to awarding organisations, where applicable

14. Appeals

Learners may appeal academic misconduct decisions through the Academy’s Appeals Procedure. Appeals must:
  • Be submitted within the specified timeframe.
  • Provide supporting evidence.
  • Clearly state the grounds for appeal.
Appeals will be reviewed by an appropriate independent reviewer where possible.

15. Responsibilities

Learners

Responsible for:
  • Producing original work.
  • Following assessment rules.
  • Acknowledging sources appropriately.
  • Maintaining academic honesty.

Staff

Responsible for:
  • Explaining academic integrity expectations.
  • Monitoring assessments fairly.
  • Investigating concerns appropriately.
  • Applying this policy consistently.

Squid Academy

Responsible for:
  • Promoting academic integrity.
  • Providing guidance and support.
  • Maintaining fair assessment processes.
  • Protecting the value of its qualifications and certifications.

16. Review

This policy will be reviewed annually or whenever academic, technological, legal, or awarding organization requirements change. \